Is our fear of the online world driving us further apart?
- Text by Emily Reynolds
- Illustrations by Sophie Mo
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3feac/3feac6624ec68d0ca3d462c2197da8e581bcfe25" alt="Is our fear of the online world driving us further apart?"
I took myself for dinner this week: a date. A strange mix of exhausted and elated, soaked to the skin from a thunderstorm, I ducked into an Italian restaurant in Soho to order a single glass of red wine and a risotto.
I was surprised by how nervous it made me. There’s a level of vulnerability in solo dining, sometimes even a danger. The idea that a man might try to speak to me was repellent, and I wanted to be left alone. But sitting with my own thoughts, no distractions, was terrifying to me. I was suddenly acutely aware of my physical form: no longer shapeless, like I was online, no longer able to melt into my phone or my laptop.
I very quickly realised that I was not alone at all. I’d been talking for days to someone I’d met online, someone who lived on the other side of the world. The conversation had veered between funny and filthy, tenderness and vulgarity, as we WhatsApped and DMed and voice-noted each other, sending endless pictures of the beautiful or banal things in front of us.
Taking a picture of my food and sending it into the void, I felt the connection flush through me and paused. Was I performing my own life for somebody else?
There’s a Margaret Atwood quote about male fantasy, on the near impossibility of escaping it. “Pretending you’re unseen, pretending you have a life of your own, that you can wash your feet and comb your hair unconscious of the ever-present watcher peering through the keyhole in your own head,” she writes. “You are a woman with a man inside watching a woman. You are your own voyeur.”
I thought of this quote as I sat there, alone but not quite, with the tangible shadow of someone else pressing against me. It’s not always a positive thing, after all: the panopticon of the male gaze, and of an online omnipresence, is often oppressive. The expectations can crush you: as my friend James succinctly put it to me, the knowledge that you can always talk to someone means you’re always considering what to say.
But at that moment, I treasured it. I treasured the feeling of being a voyeur in my own life, I treasured looking at myself with fresh eyes, with a new perspective. I treasured the person I was seeing when I did so.
And I treasured the simple, uncomplicated joy of connecting with another person four time zones away: someone I would never be beholden to, that I would never owe anything to, that I would probably never meet. Seeing my life reflected back through the filter of someone else’s made me realise how much I loved it; how happy I was.
We used to do this more. Ten years ago, when we first made MySpace accounts and happily chatted to strangers in chat rooms, there were no rules to what we could say and to who. There was a joyful unpredictability to it: talking to people from Pennsylvania one night and Seoul the next, genuinely random connections predicated on nothing more than you both having internet access.
Now, we’re more wary. Years of being ground down by bad online etiquette, by harassment, by abusive tweets; years of online dating, of being ghosted, of being left on read; years of hastily deleting posts that could probably get us fired. It’s understandably more rare that we open up, especially with someone who we might never meet.
Even on websites like Twitter, random connection is hard to come by. We follow people we work with, with the same interests as us or the same politics. The chance of something or someone genuinely surprising us is slim – something the slow decline of websites like Omegle and ChatRoulette can attest to.
In this systematic siloing of online spaces, we’ve lost something precious. We obviously need to keep ourselves safe online. But we might also benefit, sometimes, from opening ourselves up to the possibility of something more haphazard, more ridiculous, more jubilantly and pointedly meaningless. Life is full of unexpected tenderness and surprising joy, and we ought to grab it with everything we have.
Follow Emily Reynolds on Twitter.
Enjoyed this article? Like Huck on Facebook or follow us on Twitter.
Latest on Huck
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fbc16/fbc1696a9b6bfb7e210b86df84b7e4d46ffecf31" alt="Analogue Appreciation: Emma-Jean Thackray"
Analogue Appreciation: Emma-Jean Thackray
Weirdo — In an ever more digital, online world, we ask our favourite artists about their most cherished pieces of physical culture. Today, multi-instrumentalist and Brownswood affiliate Emma-Jean Thackray.
Written by: Emma-Jean Thackray
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/54c47/54c47e462815fc70aeffcc1b10da23e5c3baaa87" alt="Meet the shop cats of Hong Kong’s Sheung Wan district"
Meet the shop cats of Hong Kong’s Sheung Wan district
Feline good — Traditionally adopted to keep away rats from expensive produce, the feline guardians have become part of the central neighbourhood’s fabric. Erica’s online series captures the local celebrities.
Written by: Isaac Muk
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a39b7/a39b7c37731ea77e1a7f832b048c00e632df5d7c" alt="How trans rights activism and sex workers’ solidarity emerged in the ’70s and ’80s"
How trans rights activism and sex workers’ solidarity emerged in the ’70s and ’80s
Shoulder to Shoulder — In this extract from writer Jake Hall’s new book, which deep dives into the history of queer activism and coalition, they explore how anti-TERF and anti-SWERF campaigning developed from the same cloth.
Written by: Jake Hall
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1f82d/1f82d3e66dfadb5e2222cf6a45c667f22c4f3bf1" alt="A behind the scenes look at the atomic wedgie community"
A behind the scenes look at the atomic wedgie community
Stretched out — Benjamin Fredrickson’s new project and photobook ‘Wedgies’ queers a time-old bullying act by exploring its erotic, extreme potential.
Written by: Isaac Muk
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a8c52/a8c523d14bf6a0104c3fe98a8f83f01215cb4c0e" alt="“Welcome to the Useless Class”: Ewan Morrison in conversation with Irvine Welsh"
“Welcome to the Useless Class”: Ewan Morrison in conversation with Irvine Welsh
For Emma — Ahead of the Scottish author’s new novel, he sat down with Irvine Welsh for an in-depth discussion of its dystopic themes, and the upcoming AI “tsunami”.
Written by: Irvine Welsh
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/633ae/633ae773353d910ae296c0e9ae4efef84834cd92" alt="“Struggle helps people come together”: Sharon Van Etten & The Attachment Theory"
“Struggle helps people come together”: Sharon Van Etten & The Attachment Theory
Huck’s February interview — To hear more about the release of the indie darling’s first collaborative album, we caught up with her and Devra Hoff to hear about the record, motherhood in music and why the ’80s are back,
Written by: Isaac Muk